About Me

Name: Jack Fisher
Email: slickboy44@fastmail.fm Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Objective Religions Studies
Debunking Creationisms

Christmas Message from a Non-Believer

It's that time of year again. The winter cold is settling in, the decorations are up, and the holiday season is setting in. It's an annual tradition that impacts nearly everyone in the Western and Non-Western world. It is the time of the Christmas holiday, a holiday which is deeply steeped in modern culture. It is a festive time when people celebrate the season through family, faith, and gift-giving.

Now this time of year is special to me personally. As a non-believer who does not believe in the Christian god or the miracles of the bible any more than any other claim in mythology, many assume I'm left conflicted. This isn't necessarily the truth. Growing up I always loved Christmas, even before I was a devout Christian and before I became a non-believer. Some of my fondest memories are of Christmas. My family has always made an extra effort to make Christmas special and I've carried on with that tradition.

While I understand that Christmas is strongly tied to the story of Jesus's birth and is deeply steeped in Christian tradition, I never associated the holiday exclusively with religion. To me religion was a part of it, but it wasn't the only part. I always focused on the charity, good-will, and humanity aspects that Christmas evoked. To me these were and still are strongly associated with the teachings of Jesus Christ. He more than anyone embodied the spirit of Christmas in his teachings. Even a non-believer can respect those teachings and appreciate the holiday traditions.

Now that I am a non-believer, Christmas has taken on a slightly different context. But the meaning has never changed. I still put up a tree. I still wrap presents. I still decorate my house and spend time with my family. There just isn't a religious subtext to it anymore. I do it out of tradition and culture and I still enjoy every bit as much as I did when I was a devout Christian. Even my friends who are religious appreciate this and I wish them good will regardless of my non-belief. Even though Christmas has always been special to me, this time of year routinely evokes the usual War on Christmas in the media.

A lot of people think that because I'm a non-believer I'm on the side of the politically correct crowd when it comes to Christmas. They're dead wrong. I'm against pretty much everything the politically correct crowd stands for and that includes Christmas. I don't believe "Happy Holidays" should be mandated to be sensitive to other faiths. I don't believe nativity scenes should be banned or Christmas carols should be censored. This is a free country and these things are part of free expression. Nobody has a right NOT to be offended and if they don't like seeing this sort of thing that's their problem. They can move to a place with less freedom if that'll make them happier. It certainly wouldn't be in the spirit of the season.

Some of the more extreme atheists go so far as to twist Christmas into this secular holiday with none of the traditions that make it special. This is where I disagree. Christmas, like it or not, DOES have religious undertones. It always has even before Christianity. To take that out of it in the name of secularism is to miss the point of the free society. Christmas is not something the far left crowd should regulate. This is a tradition steeped in culture and in free societies cultures are free to express their traditions so long as they don't impose on anybody else with force. I find it embarressing for rational and reasonably minded non-believers when some atheist spokesperson tries to make a bold statement about Christmas in the media and utterly misses the point. They may claim that Christmas needs to be overhauled, but they cannot do that without infringing on the rights and traditions of others. Regardless of what anybody does or doesn't believe, that's just plain wrong.

The War on Christmas has become a joke. On one side there is fear that some crusading atheists will destroy the holiday and on the other side there is fear that some crusading Christians will use the holiday to impose their beliefs. Both are foolish and do the holiday a great disservice by politicizing it into this struggle between one group of people and another. That isn't what the spirit of the holiday is about. Even the most dogmatic crusader of either side can understand how ridiculous it is to use the holiday as a means to push an agenda.

What's important about this time of year is that humans have been celebrating it in good spirit for a long time. Even before the birth of Christ, this time of year evoked many celebrations. The Winter Solstice when Christmas occurs has long been a special time of year in many cultures. It stems from mankind's obsession with predicting and understanding the seasons, winter being one of the most important. It is when the days stop getting shorter and the nights stop getting longer that mankind feels a sort of kinship with nature and celebrations will inevitably follow. Every culture from pre-Christian pagans to Native Americans to Buddhists have some holiday associated with this time of year. It is only fitting that everyone has a chance to enjoy it without politics making an agenda out of it.

The Holidays of the Winter Solstice

So this year as every year, I look forward to celebrating the holidays as I always have. I still say Merry Christmas and not Happy Holidays. I still give gifts, spend time with loved ones, and reflect on the past year. It is a wonderful time of year and I have no desire to see it politicized. So for the sake of humanity and in the spirit of the season, I call for a treaty to end the War on Christmas so we can all celebrate peacefully.

With this in mind I wish everyone a very Merry Christmas and a wonderful holiday.

Regards,
Godless Patriot
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Religion and Plato's Noble Lie

In the annuls of Western philosophy and politics, the Ancient Greek philosopher Plato ranks among the heavyweights of notable figures that have contributed greatly to modern musings. His work had been cited many times as a source for the inspiration that later led to the free society and the American Republic. It is undeniable that the modern world owes a great deal to Plato in the Ancient Greeks. The very words 'freedom' and 'liberty' have Greek origins. Yet one concept in particular stands out that often gets overlooked in the effort to make sense of current isses. This concept is what Plato called the Noble Lie.

The Noble Lie, according to Plato, is a myth or untruth that is often of a religious or supernatural nature knowingly told by the elites to maintain social harmony. It plays off of human nature that often believes in authority figures, whether it be parents or rulers, and propogates a non-enlightened view of how the world works to the masses. These myths and untruths can keep the people from rising up and questioning the authority of the state by either claiming that the state's powers come from a supernatural force or somehow the cause of their discontent is of a supernatural origin. It has no basis in logic or reason, but because the populace doesn't have the knowledge or capacity to disprove the stories they are assumed on faith. 

The reason this was so important was because in Plato's view, society was highly stratified. The enlightened elites that ruled society from the top down were privy to the concepts of reason and logic while the vast majority of the population had no such luxuries. It would be inefficient and detrimental to the state if they tried to teach every human being in the society the logic behind their rule because not everybody is inclined to understand it and even those that do may not be inclined to believe it. So for the benefit of the rulers and the population, the Noble Lie is used to keep the rulers in power so they can focus on matters of state and the citizens content with the false knowledge that has been fed to them.

Since Plato's time, a lot has changed. Society has become more enlightened and knowledge has become more widespread and available. Yet the Noble Lie persists in the form of modern religion. Plato understood as do many other philosophers that there are two big brokers of power. One is religion and the other is government. While the government is ordained by law, religion is a more complicated force. It is ordained by prophets, myths, and alleged revelations. One notable difference between the two is that religion is often a lot slower to change and adapt with the ongoing shifts in modern society. Whereas government can make new laws, religion often requires a whole new set or revelations or a new set of prophets. In an uneducated populace this wasn't much of a problem in pre-modern times, but now that the populace is more educated the act of adapting for religion becomes much harder. This is why Plato often asserted that the rulers should use the Noble Lie to overtly guide religion into a system that best reflected the needs and goals of the state. Governmet, however, has long since lost control of religion and in a free society religion has taken on a new and more complicated existance.

The Noble Lie that ancient rulers used, albeit overtly or unknowingly, propogates today in the modern Christian Right and the culture wars that surround it. These groups, composed of the religious leaders that now control the message of the Noble Lie, now no longer aid the goal of the state. They challenge it. In Western society a great many of the causes pushed by the Christian Right and other religious organizations is at odds with the notion of freedom and liberty. They stand against homosexuality, pornography, free speech, science, and oftentimes the very reason that philosophers like Plato championed. They have taken the Noble Lie to a whole new level in as such they try to make the Noble Lie the absolute truth even when the evidence is to the contrary. To them, the truth is not dictated by reason. It is dicated by the supernatural forces they so dogmatically believe and anything that is different must somehow be flawed or conspiring against them.

It is a facet of the Noble Lie even Plato never could have foreseen. Thanks to movements like the Enlightenment and the Protestant Reformation, religion no longer stands as a tool of reason. It stands as an enemy of reason. Those that arrogantly cling to this Noble Lie do so with arrogant pride, at times setting themselves apart from others that believe differently. They boast how they have the truth and others do not. The true irony is that this so called truth is steeped in this concept that is known as the Noble Lie and they will not change their beliefs until all opposition has either capitulated or been rendered obsolete. It is a dangerous precedent, religious leaders asserting authority with such selfish and arrogant pride. It causes them to forget or even reject that fragile notion of humanity that allows them to relate to their fellow man on an equal footing. This concept of all individuals being of the same flaws and limitations is core tenant of the individualism that the Ancient Greeks championed. The Religious Right, especially the Christian Right in America, is going against such notions by parading their beliefs as some sacred knowledge that makes them better than everybody else.

This arrogance can come at a great cost in terms of human suffering. Religious leaders who push their arrogant social agenda are immune from the guilt and responsibility of those they hurt. The victims include those dying in Africa because of AIDS, which is made much worse by religious leaders opposing the distribution of condoms. Homosexuals throughout the world are also victims as they routinely have their rights denied and their very existence criminalized under the guise of religious zealotry. There are also the non-believers, the religous minorities, and educated scholars that shed light on the ancient myths used to justify such inhumanity. All are targets by those who abuse the concept of the Noble Lie. They are without excuse, denying their own humanity in exchange for the selfish vindication of being elevated above their fellow man.

Now does this mean that all religion and religious organizations are guilty of such atrocities? Of course not. The Noble Lie in the modern context does not denote that all religion is based on an underlying lie from the authorities. Religion propogated in the true name of spirituality, that which does not engage in outright culture wars, is a vital and often inevitable aspect of society. Human beings are often pre-disposed to such beliefs because no human being can know everything so some fil that gap with spirituality. It can be a very good thing and it can drive people to do acts of great charity. 

Even major religions like Christianity, Judaism, and Islam can have these effects by keeping these concepts of god and spirit in the proper context. That context is and always has been the personal beliefs of the individual and the kin around them. What one person believes is theirs and theirs alone. It is only when those individuals and their peers elevate their beliefs above that of their fellow man that they succumb to the arrogant pride that drives them away from their humanity. The people of the Christian Right and many other radical religions throughout the world, including Islamic terrorists, have shunned their brothers and sisters and ignored all guilt and responsibility. They are the true danger to freedom and peace and they will never understand that until they humble themselves before their fellow man. So long as their arrogant pride keeps them from doing so, conflict will continue.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (22) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Debate Over a Christian Notion

Much has been made since President Barack Obama made the statement that "America is not a Christian nation." Various opinion writers and columnists have expressed their criticism and at times outrage. This issue comes on the heels of a recent article in Newsweek ominously entitled "The Decline and Fall of Christian America." Many have had plenty to say on this issue as well including Town Hall's own Brent Bozell, Star Parker, Terry Paulson, and the ever rediculous Doug Giles.
 
 
Terry Paulson: Put Your Bet On God Over Newsweek
 
 
There is a lot to be said over this issue. Ideologues and zealots cling to the notion of a Christian nation the same way they cling to their invisibile deity. It's no secret that the Christian Right has been a major political force. They have worked tirelessly to try and impose their values and worldview on the rest of the nation, completely disregarding the unavoidable fact that such a goal completely conflicts with every notion of a free society. And they'll use any excuse to justify their tyranny, including twisting the facts of history.
 
The issue of America being a Christian nation should have been dispelled in 1797 when the 5th congress unanimously ratified the Treaty of Tripoli. In this historic document it says outright in article 11:
 
"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
 
And this is a time when many founding fathers were still alive. Now some would debate this is bogus because many of the founding fathers were still devout Christians. This is true, but they still saw the need to dispell any notion that America is a Christian nation just as many nations of Europe were considered Christian nations at the time. It goes along with the constitution which says in the first amendment that no official religion will be established and none will be endorsed over the other, even if it is practiced by the majority of the population.
 
But many ignore this and will go to great lengths quote mining the founding fathers, espousing their religious convictions. But as with all quote mining, it proves nothing. The personal views of the founding fathers were irrelevant to the concept of America being a Christian nation. At no point did they thrust their views into the constitution. To say this nation is Christian just because the founding fathers were Christians is a misnomer. All the founding fathers were also white and had English roots. But nobody says America is an English nation even though it was based largely on English legal traditions. Nobody says it's a white nation either (although some racist groups still do). Just because the population was Christian doesn't make America a Christian nation.
 
It's also worth noting that the government of the United States was not founded on any Christian traditions. America was founded as a constitutional republic and the very idea of a republic was first espoused by the Ancient Greek philosopher, Solon. And the first real republic was set up by the Ancient Romans and many of the ideas they built upon found their way into the constitution. But nobody says this is a Roman or Greek nation.
 
Others will say the concept of natural rights that include life, liberty, and property are somehow inspired by divine laws. But this is inaccurate as well. The ideas of natural rights came from philosophers like Voltaire and John Locke, who were products of the enlightenment. And one of the key facets of the enlightenment was moving away from religious dogma and favoring more secular views to govern society. Many of these thinkers were also Christians, but their faith was secondary to their ideas. Their faith was personal, not something to be subsidized and imposed by state forces.
 
The notion of America being a Christian nation is as absurd now as it was back in 1797. But the Christian Right will continue to contend this in order to maintain whatever credibility they can so they can further their agenda. They easily forget that no matter what America was founded upon or what the beliefs were of the founders, the principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness remain true for every citizen. It is the right of every man, woman, and child in this country and no one group deserves to take credit for it. For Christians like Brent Bozell, Star Parker, Terry Paulson, and Doug Giles to maintain that is not only wrong, it's hopelessly arrogant.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Christmas from an Atheist's Perspective

During every holiday season the media usually jumps on a story about some radical atheist trying to ban Christmas displays. These stories, which the Christian Right loves to point out, represent only a small minority of atheists who are radicals and are just as wrong as the Christians who want to ban non-believers from gaining any kind of status or influence. Most atheists still celebrate Christmas. Even though I have been a non-believer for years, I still celebrate the season by decorating my house, buying presents for loved ones, and enjoying the festivities. But to me, there is nothing supernatural about the holiday. I do not associate it with the birth of Jesus Christ or any miracles. I associate it with the messages of peace, giving, and good will towards all. And it is my favorite holiday and has been for years.

But it is also worth pointing out that Christmas, like any other religious holiday, has a context to it. Most Christians do not question it or look into the matter. Most are content to believe whatever their parents or pastor tells them. But if anybody tries to do the research, they'll come up with some unexpected and in some ways disturbing answers. Because when the history of Christmas is put into a real-world, non-supernatural context it takes on a different meaning to believers.

The first and most glaring discrepancy has to do with the date itself. Most people never question whether or not Jesus was born on December 25th. But a brief glimpse into history shows how that may not be the case. Research among scholars has shown that the actual birthday of Jesus Christ was forgotten in the early Christian church. Differing groups celebrated his birth on days ranging from January 5th and May 4th. It wasn't until the 4th century, after Christianity had become the official church of Rome, that December 25th was chosen as the date of Jesus's birth. History does document this and there is a reason why this date was chosen.

Among nearly all civilizations and cultures within the Middle East and Europe dating back to well before the time of Christ, one of the most important parts of the year was the Winter Solstice. On December 21st, the days are shortest and the nights are longest. And on December 25th, the days start getting longer again in a noticeable manner. This was important because it helped cultures measure time and seasons, which aided them in farming. So it was only natural that this date would take on more meaningful significance in the eyes of spirituality.

Even during the time of Christ, many pagans celebrated December 25th as a major holiday. The Babylonians celebrated 25th as the "Victory of the Sun" festival. The Romans celebrated December 17th through 23rd as Saturnalia, the festival of Saturn. In addition, December 25th was the alleged birth date of many other savior gods who had stories similar to that of Christ. Attis, son of the virgin Nana, was a Roman pagan icon who was said to have been born on December 25th. Dionysis was a Greek savior god who was worshiped around a century before Christ and his birthday was celebrated on December 25th. But probably the most well known and well documented savior god born on that date besides Christ was Mithra. Mithra was a Persian god whose worship was a chief rival to Christianity in the early days of the faith. And like the other savior gods before him, there were many of the same stories built around his life such as his birth being witnessed by shepards, performing miracles in his life like healing the sick and casting out devils. He was also said to have had 12 disciples and was crucified around the Spring equinox, at the same time as Easter, and ascended into heaven.

So Jesus's story was not unique. But was his life a myth? Probably not. Most scholars agree that there probably was a flesh and blood man named Jesus who walked Palestine around the first century. But there is no evidence that the miracles of his life occured anywhere outside the bible. Most agree that his life was later mythologized and embellished as many great leaders often are after their deaths. And Jesus did live at a time when many of these savior gods were very popular so it is only natural that later followers would attach such attributes as the virgin birth on December 25th in order to become more acceptable to pagans and other faiths. And history documents this shift with the emergance of Jesus's divinity through scriptures and gospels that started with the letters of Paul and were later cannonized with the gospels. But it is also worth noting that even Paul's letters, which are the oldest documentation of Christian beliefs, still were not written down until after Christ's death. And of the 40 secular historians living at the time, only about 4 or 5 give mention to Jesus and none of them document any of the events the bible discribes.

So why did Jesus become so universally accepted? Part of that has to do with the appealing message. Other faiths like Mithrism were very exclusive and secretive. The average person was not allowed to partake in the festivals. Christianity was unique in that it offered salvation to everybody, not just elites and their contemporaries. That open message was part of why Christinaity became so popular so fast and why the Romans were threatened by it because it threatened to upset the ridged hierarchy of their society. Another major reason had to do with the emporer Constantine, who made Christinaity the official religion of the empire. This big endorsement gave Christinaity support that no other faith could boast so it propsered while others eventually died out. It was after this big endorsement that the bible was canonized and December 25th was decided as the date of Jesus's birth.

So Christmas in context is not necessarily about the birth of Jesus. It is part of the evolution of a holiday that has its roots in the earliest parts of civilization. Other aspects such as Christmas trees, gift giving, and Santa Clause came later. But the message is still the same, preaching peace on Earth and good will towards all. And that is a good message for anybody to celebrate no matter what their faith.

For more information on Christmas and the non-biblical life of Jesus, please consult the following link, which has a great deal of other well-researched articles on religion in general:

The History of Jesus Christ

Regardless of whether or not Jesus was a holy figure as he said he was, the message of Christmas still remains and it is a message I celebrate every year. Even as an atheist, I have a strong appreciation for what Christmas brings and I will continue to celebrate it. So from the Godless Patriot, I wish everybody regardless of their religion or lack thereof a Merry Christmas and a Happy Holidays.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (13) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »