About Me

Name: Jack Fisher
Email: slickboy44@fastmail.fm Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Objective Religions Studies
Debunking Creationisms

The Convenience of Belief

Everybody has their beliefs about the ongoing debates regarding health care, the wars in the Middle East, and the job Barack Obama is doing as president. People cling strongly to these beliefs, arguing them passionately in town hall meetings. Some of their beliefs are rational and valid. Others are not. There are people who believe ardently that President Obama is a socialist seeking to make America a completely socialist country. There are people who believe just as ardently that he is not a natural born citizen and his election to the White House is henceforth not legitimate. These people, the Birthers, believe the same way the Truthers believe that the September 11th attacks were ochastrated by the government. Creationists follow the same logic, believing ardently that their beliefs about the creation of the world is valid and that evolution is some vast conspiracy orchastrated by anti-Christian forces. They all believe in their heart of hearts that they are right and what they believe is true. But they're all wrong in one critical assumption. They believe that their belief alone is proof enough, even when there are countless facts that disprove them. Thus they cling to their belief, ignoring sound rational arguments to the contrary.

But why do they believe? There are plenty of ways to verify their claims. Many like creationism and the 9/11 conspiracy theories have indeed been disproven. Why won't they listen to rational arguments? The answer lies in the very nature of belief itself. Human beings are innately programmed to believe certain things without proof. It's part of our evolutionary heritiage. Richard Dawkins wrote extensively about it in his book "The God Delusion." Human beings have the capacity for reason, but they cannot employ that facet in every situation. If they are told "don't approach a hungry crocadile" it would take considerable time and energy to prove that rationally. It's much easier for someone to be told by parents or authority figures and have them believe it without proof. It saves energy, it saves time, and it enhances survival. Therefore, it is a trait that evolution has favored.

But like so many other evolutionary traits, there are drawbacks. This feature that allows human beings to believe without proof is also what breeds irrational thinking such as stereotypes, racism, and religious dogma. It is further encouraged when the capacity for human beings to know is limited. For much of human history, people didn't know what the stars were, how life began, or why things happened the way they did. That need to know is another vital survival skill because without in depth knowledge of their surroundings, people falter and become vulnerable. Beliefs, whether they are about conspiracy theories or religion, are convenient explanations. They save people the time and energy from actually investigating themselves. It's vital since not everybody has the resources to investigate. Not everyone can go down to Ground Zero and analyze the wreckage to verify the claims of the 9/11 Truthers. Not everyone can go to Hawaii either and verify Barack Obama's birth certificate. Belief is the only option and it is very convenient and often makes people feel better because it makes them feel like they know something.

It is how religion and superstition propogate. It is how conspiracy theories keep going even when they've been debunked. People cling to belief because it's easier. It's convenient. And it makes them feel good. It also saves them from the anxious feelings they get when they say to themselves "I don't know." It is a part of human nature and one that can only be countered with solid reason. Society has changed so much since the days of the Stone Age, yet people still cling to mythology from the Bronze Age and mythology of the modern era. They may believe they are right and thus vindicated, but the hard truth is that reality is never as ideal as people want it to be. The world isn't fair and it isn't always as magical as people would like it to be. Belief is fine, but pushing belief as truth is not. In a free society, claims can only stand on the merits that support them. And belief, while convenient and comforting, is not enough.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Angels & Demons & Nonsense

Following up on the success of the "Da Vinci Code," a new film adaptation of a popular Dan Brown book "Angels & Demons" was released recently. It follows the further adventures of Robert Langdon, a respected academic who specializes in symbols, as he gets caught up in a battle between the Vatican and the mysterious Illuminati. One side is an age old religious institution and the other is an age old academic institution, symbolizing a percieved conflict between science and religion. It's meant to be a powerful and thrilling story, but it highlights a gross distortion of the truth.
 
It's a story that's nothing new. For decades religious zealots have claimed that an elaborate conspiracy of secular academics is plotting to overthrow religious institutions. For decades conspiracy theorists have claimed that religious institutions are plotting to overthrow secular society, replacing all science and reason with their own narrow dogma. It tells a great story and it's a great rallying cry for ideologues seeking attention. But as with all conspiracy theories, the truth is not so spectacular.
 
It is a fact that the Illuminati were a real organization. But it's nowhere near as powerful as Dan Brown describes in his book. It was originally an academic circle founded by Adam Weishaupt on May 1st 1776 in Baveria. Their purpose seemed ominous. They intended to overthrow the Vatican and the conservative Kingdom of Baveria and replace it with a liberal republic based on the ideas of the Enlightenment. It was secretive and it did have a number of influencial members that even included some ruling princes at the time. But like all secret societies, it didn't last. The organization fell apart in 1790. Other incarnations emerged over the years, but none had any of much coherence beyond a small inner circle of people with little or no influence in world affairs.
 
While the real story is barely a footnote in history, conspiracy theoriests with active imaginations love to tell stories about how secret organizations secretly control every government and are bent on global domination. Religous zealots love it as well because it gives them something to scare people with and gain supporters. Creationists groups like AnswersInGenesis and the Institute for Creation Research will tell a similar story about how science conspires to suppress religion (or truth as they call it) and ignores evidence they claim proves their dogmatic beliefs. Ben Stein made a movie that laid out this idea in "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" by trying to show that any questioning of evolution was shunned. But in order to make this point, he has to do things like lie, quote mine, and mislead viewers. Pretty much is entire movie has been debunked and the poor reception by critics and average moviegoers show his message didn't get through.
 
 
From Dan Brown to Ben Stein, conspiracy theories always run into the same problems. They ignore reality. It's appealing for some people to live in a world that's more fanciful than it really is. But this is pure self-delusion, nothing more. The debate between science and religion is not some epic war people make it out to be. It is an ongoing series of disagrements between two things that operate under different principles. Religion deals with the supernatural, superstition, and personal beliefs. Science deals with reason, logic, observation, and experimentation. It's only natural they would conflict with one another because they operate so differently. But just because they are in conflict, that doesn't mean there is some vast, underground war going on between them. Reality still is reality, regardless of what books say. People can expect to be entertained by movies like "Angels and Demons" and "Expelled" but they can't expect to be enlightened.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »